Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Why would the UN favor Obama? He would give the UN control of the US economy.

A weak, exhausted electorate now all but a slave to international market scams (see current financial meltdown, Hank Paulson, Al Gore, Goldman Sachs, Hollywood, Soros, etc.) will fall easily with the final nail in the coffin: killing the last bit of US initiative in favor of carbon trading scams. ALL DONE THROUGH THE UNITED NATIONS, of course!: A President Obama would mean job- and growth-killing subservience to U.N. dogma on climate change and an EPA empowered to regulate and control our means of production....
  • Placing carbon dioxide on the same level as other pollutants will lead to caps on power-plant emissions, leading to higher energy prices as new plants are not built and existing plants are forced to use expensive CO2 emission controls.

Bloomberg says this move may halt construction plans for half of the 130 proposed new U.S. coal plants. Twenty-five U.S. states now get more than 50% of their electricity from coal.

  • Rust Belt manufacturing states such as Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania would be particularly hard-hit....
  • Rajendra Pachauri, head of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, says an
Obama win would help clear the deadlock in talks on a new international agreement on climate change to replace the failed Kyoto Protocol....

This is something the Bush administration has resisted even after the Supreme Court in 2007 said the government has the authority to do so.

  • He "would initiate those rulemakings," his energy adviser, Jason Grumet, said in an Oct. 6 interview in Boston.

"In the absence of congressional action" 18 months after Obama's inauguration, the EPA would move ahead on its own, he warned."...

  • via Lucianne.com
This brief article doesn't get into all the other problems connected with the UN, which is accountable to no one and whose employees skim millions off for their personal use every year. (sm)

Labels: ,


Post a Comment

<< Home