Friday, April 30, 2010

How did US Supreme Court decide CO2 was a danger to humanity? For one, Michael MacCracken. Disgraced UN fraudster is 'advisor' to his group.

Unbeknown to the evil US middle class, they've been working on the global warming scam for decades. Michael MacCracken is one of the guys who influenced a Supreme Court Justice to declare CO2 a danger to humanity in 2007. Listed as an 'advisor' to MacCracken's 'Climate Institute' is none other than disgraced UN climate Nobel laureate and business tycoon, RJ Pachauri (trained as a railway economist, not a climate scientist):

"Michael C. MacCracken

Chief Scientist for Climate Change Programs
Climate Institute

Justice Stevens favorably cited his affidavit relating global climate change to impacts on particular regions in his

April 2007 decision in Massachusetts et al. versus EPA.

Michael C. MacCracken is Chief Scientist for Climate Change Programs with the Climate Institute, which is a non-partisan, non-governmental organization established in 1986 to heighten national and international awareness of climate change and to identify practical ways for responding. Dr. MacCracken recently completed a four-year term as president of the International Association of Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences, during which he served on the executive committees of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics and Scientific Committee for Oceanic Research. He was a lead author of Confronting Climate Change: Avoiding the Unmanageable and Managing the Unavoidable, which was prepared for the UN's Commission on Sustainable Development. Previously, Dr. MacCracken was the leader of climate change research at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1968-93), and executive director of the Office of the U.S. Global Change Research Program (1993-97) and of its National Assessment Coordination Office (1997-2001).

Justice Stevens favorably cited his affidavit relating global climate change to impacts on particular regions in

his April 2007 decision in Massachusetts et al. versus EPA."

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home